http://www.outdoornews.com/March-2014/Doe-permits-could-be-lost-in-27-counties/
Doe permits could be lost in 27 counties
BY MIKE MOORE EDITOR
March 13, 2014
Columbus — A proposal is on the table that would eliminate antlerless permits in 27 primarily southeast counties, according to the DNR Division of Wildlife.
The $15 antlerless tags have been in place since 2007 when they were first introduced to be used statewide with an expiration date just before deer gun season.
“As evidenced over the past six years of very liberal regulations, this incentive has worked very well,” said Division of Wildlife Chief Scott Zody. “Many of our counties are either at or very near their (population) goals.”
The Ohio Wildlife Council will determine the fate of the proposal when it votes on deer regulations in April.
From the outset, the goal of the $15 antlerless permit was to incentivize hunters to take more does and to do so early on in the season, Zody said.
“In looking at those counties ... we feel like we’re at or very, very close to being at (population density) goal,” Zody said. “We want to continue to maintain a sufficient harvest pressure in those counties to
maintain and stabilize the numbers. But, we no longer feel we need to utilize the tool of the antlerless permit in those counties.”
Antlerless deer may still be killed in those counties without the low-cost permits.
“What we’re saying is that you can still harvest three deer in those counties, but you just have to do it with the either-sex tags, which are good for the entire season,” Zody said.
Zody said this should not be interpreted as a move to entirely eliminate the antlerless tags.
“I don’t think we’ll ever totally eliminate (antlerless tags) as a tool,” he said. “We’re still going to have a need for these permits in your urban areas and in your controlled hunt situations.”
Still, the permits’ effectiveness will be subject to a year-to-year, county-to-county evaluation, Zody said.
“We want to be sure we’re using this as a tool,” Zody said. “When you use it, get it out of the toolbox and put it back when you’re finished. That doesn’t mean you lock it up forever. It just means you’re careful when and how you use it.”
Division of Wildlife deer project manager Mike Tonkovich said the antlerless permits have worked as intended, but now is the time to take some of the pressure off in those counties.
“This will always be a part of the deer management tool box in Ohio,” said Tonkovich. “ ... They’ll always be available to effect change in harvest. We’ll just adjust the numbers that we’re allowing to be sold, like we are doing here.”
Zody said the goal is not to discourage the taking of antlerless deer, but densities in those 27 counties are closer to population goals than the rest of the state.
“We’re not saying in the other counties ‘don’t shoot a doe,’” Zody said. “We’re just not going to provide that incentive for you to go out there and do it like we are in some of those other counties.”
The state, if the proposal is approved, stands to lose money, but money is not driving the decision, Zody said.
“This is not a monetary decision, it’s a deer management decision,” he said. “There is the potential for us to have a little bit of lost revenue. A lot is going to depend on how our hunters react and how they behave with respect to buying tags.”
This article appears in the March 2014 issue of Outdoor News
Did you like what you read here? Subscribe to Outdoor News »
Doe permits could be lost in 27 counties
BY MIKE MOORE EDITOR
March 13, 2014
Columbus — A proposal is on the table that would eliminate antlerless permits in 27 primarily southeast counties, according to the DNR Division of Wildlife.
The $15 antlerless tags have been in place since 2007 when they were first introduced to be used statewide with an expiration date just before deer gun season.
“As evidenced over the past six years of very liberal regulations, this incentive has worked very well,” said Division of Wildlife Chief Scott Zody. “Many of our counties are either at or very near their (population) goals.”
The Ohio Wildlife Council will determine the fate of the proposal when it votes on deer regulations in April.
From the outset, the goal of the $15 antlerless permit was to incentivize hunters to take more does and to do so early on in the season, Zody said.
“In looking at those counties ... we feel like we’re at or very, very close to being at (population density) goal,” Zody said. “We want to continue to maintain a sufficient harvest pressure in those counties to
maintain and stabilize the numbers. But, we no longer feel we need to utilize the tool of the antlerless permit in those counties.”
Antlerless deer may still be killed in those counties without the low-cost permits.
“What we’re saying is that you can still harvest three deer in those counties, but you just have to do it with the either-sex tags, which are good for the entire season,” Zody said.
Zody said this should not be interpreted as a move to entirely eliminate the antlerless tags.
“I don’t think we’ll ever totally eliminate (antlerless tags) as a tool,” he said. “We’re still going to have a need for these permits in your urban areas and in your controlled hunt situations.”
Still, the permits’ effectiveness will be subject to a year-to-year, county-to-county evaluation, Zody said.
“We want to be sure we’re using this as a tool,” Zody said. “When you use it, get it out of the toolbox and put it back when you’re finished. That doesn’t mean you lock it up forever. It just means you’re careful when and how you use it.”
Division of Wildlife deer project manager Mike Tonkovich said the antlerless permits have worked as intended, but now is the time to take some of the pressure off in those counties.
“This will always be a part of the deer management tool box in Ohio,” said Tonkovich. “ ... They’ll always be available to effect change in harvest. We’ll just adjust the numbers that we’re allowing to be sold, like we are doing here.”
Zody said the goal is not to discourage the taking of antlerless deer, but densities in those 27 counties are closer to population goals than the rest of the state.
“We’re not saying in the other counties ‘don’t shoot a doe,’” Zody said. “We’re just not going to provide that incentive for you to go out there and do it like we are in some of those other counties.”
The state, if the proposal is approved, stands to lose money, but money is not driving the decision, Zody said.
“This is not a monetary decision, it’s a deer management decision,” he said. “There is the potential for us to have a little bit of lost revenue. A lot is going to depend on how our hunters react and how they behave with respect to buying tags.”
This article appears in the March 2014 issue of Outdoor News
Did you like what you read here? Subscribe to Outdoor News »